Background
These are circulating antibodies to phospholipids associated with venous and arterial thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and or recurrent pregnancy loss. There are seveal autoantibodies which comprise this group:
Anticardiolipins
Antiphosphatidylinositol
Antiphosphatidylglycerol
Antiphosphatidylserine
Anticardiolipins are the most commonly detected antiphospholipid antibodies. In general, to diagnose the syndrome, a positive blood test to either the lupus anticoagulant or the anticardiolipin antibody on two separate occasions at least 8 weeks apart is needed.
The Lupus-like Anticoagulant forms a heterogeneous group of IgG or IgM antibodies directed against the phospholipid or phospholipidprotein components involved in the activation of the coagulation cascade. Thus, it is a subset of the antiphospholipid antibodies. However, it is NOT associated with a clinical bleeding tendency unless an additional hemostatic abnormality is present. Instead, it is associated with arterial and venous thrombosis occurring in 25-50% of patients who carry this protein.
The diagnosis rests upon the laboratory evaluation. Cardiolipin (anionic phospholipid) has been widely used for the detection of these antibodies. The majority of these antibodies crossreact with other anioinic phospholipids, but some also react with zwetterionic phospholipids. Some of these protein substrates include prothrombin, annexin V, beta-2 glycoprotein I, protein C and S. The anionic antibodies may be IgG or IgM whereas antibodies to zwitterionic phospholipids are more frequently IgM.
OUTLINE
DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS CHARACTERIZATION Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies SLE 20-35% of patients
Malignancies
Drugs
Infections
Recurrent pregnancy loss 11-22% of cases, in all trimestersAUTOIMMUNE BLISTERING DISEASE
Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with autoimmune blistering disease.Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Sep;57(3):397-400. Abstract quote
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the serum levels and frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and confirm the clinical importance of these antibodies in patients with autoimmune blistering disease (ABD).
METHODS: IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), IgG anticardiolipin-beta(2) glycoprotein I complex antibody (aCL/beta(2)GPI), and IgG antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex antibody (aPS/PT) were examined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 71 patients with ABD, including pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, and bullous pemphigoid.
RESULTS: The prevalence of IgG aCL, IgM aCL, aCL/beta(2)GPI, and IgG aPS/PT was positive for 22.4%, 9.1%, 9.9%, and 25.4% of the ABD patients, respectively, whereas these antibodies were not detected in any of the normal control subjects. Ten of 20 patients with ABD who were attending our hospital in 2004 tested positive for aPLs, and thromboembolism was detected in 7 of 10 patients with aPLs.
LIMITATIONS: Follow-up studies, especially with a large patient group, will be needed to clarify the clinical relevance of aPLs in ABD.
CONCLUSION: aPLs are frequently detected in patients with ABD. Careful examination and follow-up for thromboembolism may be necessary in ABD patients with aPLs.PREGNANCY LOSS Relationship of antiphospholipid antibodies to pregnancy loss in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.
Ginsberg JS, Brill-Edwards P, Johnston M, Denburg JA, Andrew M, Burrows RF, Bensen W, Cividino A, Long AA.
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Blood 1992 Aug 15;80(4):975-80 Abstract quote
To determine whether an association exists between the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy loss, a cross-sectional study was performed. Consecutive women who were referred to three outpatient rheumatology clinics and who had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a history of one or more pregnancies were evaluated.
Patients were interviewed to determine outcomes of all previous pregnancies. Blood was taken on two separate occasions at least 3 months apart to test for the presence of the lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies; on both occasions, five tests of the lupus anticoagulant, with well-defined normal ranges, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure IgG anticardiolipin antibodies were performed. Patients were considered to be positive for the lupus anticoagulant if one or more tests was abnormal on both occasions and positive for anticardiolipin antibodies if the test was abnormal on both occasions. Forty-two women were studied. Statistically significant associations were shown between lupus anticoagulant positivity and previous pregnancy loss (odds ratio [OR], 4.8; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.0 to 23.6; P = .05) and between anticardiolipin antibody positivity and previous pregnancy loss (OR, 20.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 97.0; P = .01). All seven women with multiple episodes of pregnancy loss were lupus anticoagulant positive and four of these were also anticardiolipin antibody positive. If patients who are transiently positive for lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies are considered to be test positive, the associations with pregnancy loss are no longer statistically significant. Within the group of lupus anticoagulant-positive patients, we observed stronger associations between the presence of six or more positive tests and pregnancy loss than between the presence of two to five positive tests and pregnancy loss. No single test for the lupus anticoagulant provides a statistically significant association with pregnancy loss.
The results of our study show that by performing multiple lupus anticoagulant tests and by repeating testing for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies on more than one occasion, significant associations between the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and previous pregnancy loss can be shown in patients with SLE.
The influence of antiphospholipid antibodies on the pregnancy outcome of patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Heilmann L, von Tempelhoff GF, Kuse S.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, City Hospital Ruesselsheim, Germany.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2001 Oct;7(4):281-5 Abstract quote
Several therapeutic regimens have been proposed for women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and antiphospholipid antibodies (APA). Conflicting results have been reported about women with history of RSA, positive APA, and failure of standard therapy.
To evaluate the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in RSA patients with APA and history of treatment failure, we initiated a study with standard therapy (aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin) and intravenous immunoglobulin.
We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test to screen IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies, and a diluted Russel viper venom time assay for the lupus anticoagulant activity. Altogether, 66 pregnant women with positive APAs at the first visit could be included. Patients with hereditable thrombophilic factors were excluded. After confirmation of the pregnancy, women received a basis immunization of 0.3 g/kg immunoglobulin in a 4-week cycle until the 28th to 32nd week of gestation. All patients received 100 mg/d aspirin and 3,000 anti-Xa U/d certoparin. Among the 66 pregnant women, 17 were persistently autoantibody positive (25.8%), of whom 11 (16.7%) were ACA positive alone, 2 (3%) were lupus anticoagulant positive, and 4 (6.4%) had both antibody types. A total of 49 patients had positive APAs at the initial test, but were negative for ACA and lupus anticoagulant at the second test administered approximately 5 weeks after the start of therapy. We described this group in our following observation as "antibody negative." Sixteen of the 17 autoantibody-positive patients (94.1%) were delivered of live infants compared with 40 patients (81.6%) in the antibody-negative group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.4). The overall miscarriage rate was 12.1% and the fetal loss rate was 15.2%. Four patients (25%) in the antibody-positive group developed symptoms of preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation compared with four patients (9.8%) in the antibody-negative group.
In conclusion, we see a reduction of the fetal loss rate in patients with RSA and positive APA (5.8%) compared with APA-negative (18.4%) women with the same therapy (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.04 to 2.3).
AUTOIMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA Antiphospholipid antibodies and antiphospholipid syndrome in patients presenting with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a prospective cohort study.
Diz-Kucukkaya R, Hacihanefioglu A, Yenerel M, Turgut M, Keskin H, Nalcaci M, Inanc M.
Divisions of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey.
Blood 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1760-4 Abstract quote
The pathogenetic role and the clinical importance of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) are not clear. In this study, the prevalence and clinical significance of APAs were investigated in patients with ITP.
Eighty-two newly diagnosed ITP patients were prospectively studied. They were evaluated for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and immunoglobulin G/M anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs). Thirty-one patients (37.8%) were APA positive at diagnosis. No statistically significant differences were found between the APA-positive and APA-negative groups regarding gender, initial platelet counts, or response to methylprednisolone therapy. After 5 years of follow-up, cumulative thrombosis-free survival of APA-positive (n = 31) and APA-negative (n = 51) ITP patients was 39% and 97.7%, respectively. A significant difference was found between these groups by log-rank test (P =.0004). In addition, LA was an important risk marker for the development of thrombosis in ITP patients. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 14 ITP patients (45%) who had APA positivity developed clinical features (thrombosis or fetal losses) of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). There were no differences between the APA-positive patients with and without APS regarding the initial platelet counts, response to the therapy, or ACA positivity. The positivity rate for LA was significantly higher in those patients with ITP who developed APS (chi(2): P =.0036; relative risk 7.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-47).
In conclusion, this study indicates that a significant proportion of patients initially presenting with ITP and APA positivity developed APS. In patients with ITP, the persistent presence of APAs is an important risk factor for the development of APS.
LUPUS-LIKE ANTICOAGULANT 5-10% of SLE patients
Drug therapy Phenothiazine
Lymphoproliferative disorders
IdiopathicAnticardiolipin antibodies: a study in cerebral venous thrombosis.
Christopher R, Nagaraja D, Dixit NS, Narayanan CP.
Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Acta Neurol Scand 1999 Feb;99(2):121-4 Abstract quote
OBJECTIVES: Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) have been recognized as a marker for an increased risk of thrombosis. There are no documented reports from India on the prevalence of aCL in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Our study aimed at establishing the prevalence of these antibodies in patients with CVT and evaluating their clinical significance.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with CVT diagnosed by angiography and/or cranial CT were investigated for the presence of aCL along with 31 age- and sex-matched normal controls. All subjects had no overt evidence of systemic lupus erythematosis or related autoimmune disorders. The titres of IgG and IgM type of aCL were estimated in the sera using a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Anticardiolipin antibodies were detected in 22.6% of CVT patients compared to 3.2% of normal controls (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 75.65). Five CVT patients had both IgG and IgM antibodies, and 2 had only IgG antibodies. The aCL positive group did not differ from the aCL-negative group with respect to the clinical characteristics and the demographic and risk factor profile.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that anticardiolipin antibodies are a risk marker for cerebral venous thrombosis. Further studies on a larger group of patients are needed to establish the role of aCL in the pathogenesis of CVT.
HEPATITIS C Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: characterization in relation to antiphospholipid syndrome.
Ordi-Ros J, Villarreal J, Monegal F, Sauleda S, Esteban I, Vilardell M.
Department of Internal Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000 Mar;7(2):241-4 Abstract quote
The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is usually defined by the association of clinical manifestations that comprise venous and/or arterial thrombosis, recurrent fetal losses, and thrombocytopenia, along with the presence of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and/or lupus anticoagulant. Various infectious diseases can induce aCL; however, these antibodies are not usually associated with thrombotic events, as happens with autoimmune diseases, in which these antibodies need the presence of beta(2)-glycoprotein I.
Levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM aCL antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 243 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and 100 healthy controls. Clinical events of APS, the level of beta(2)-glycoprotein dependence of aCL, the presence of cryoglobulins and other autoantibodies, and cross-reactivity between purified aCL and HCV were evaluated. Positive results for aCL antibodies were found more frequently (3. 3%) for the patients with HCV infection than for healthy controls (0%). All positive aCL antibodies were beta(2)-glycoprotein I independent.
No significant association was found between aCL antibodies and clinical manifestations of APS, neither was one found between the presence of other autoantibodies or cryoglobulins and that of aCL. Finally, no cross-reactivity between aCL antibodies and HCV antigens was observed. As previously reported, aCL antibodies seem to be an epiphenomenon, and they do not have clinical or laboratory significance in HCV patients.
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein and Autoimmune Antibodies in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome With a History of Thrombosis
Dandan Zhao, MD, PhD
Hirokazu Ogawa, MD
Xiang Wang, MD
Gregory S. Cameron, PhD
Darric E. Baty, MD
Jeffrey S. Dlott, MD
and Douglas A. Triplett, MD, FACPAm J Clin Pathol 2001;760-767 Abstract quote
The prevalence and clinical significance of plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and antibodies against oxLDL (anti-oxLDL) were evaluated in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
OxLDL and IgG anti-oxLDL were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in plasma samples from 80 patients with APS. Positive values (mean + 3 SD) for oxLDL and anti-oxLDL were found in 21 (26%) and 19 (24%) of 80 patients with APS, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects. Levels of oxLDL and anti-oxLDL antibodies in subgroupings of patients with APS who had experienced thrombotic events were compared. There were significant differences among the groups for the levels of both oxLDL and anti-oxLDL antibodies. Pairwise comparisons between the groups yielded similar but not identical results. There was a significant, positive correlation between levels of plasma oxLDL and anti-oxLDL.
These results suggest that elevated levels of plasma oxLDL and anti-oxLDL may be risk factors and potential markers for thrombosis, especially for arterial thrombotic events, in patients with APS.
STROKE
Antiphospholipid antibodies and subsequent thrombo-occlusive events in patients with ischemic stroke.
Levine SR, Brey RL, Tilley BC, Thompson JL, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR, Murphy A, Lu Y, Costigan TM, Rhine C, Levin B, Triplett DA, Mohr JP; APASS Investigators.
Department of Neurology, Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.
JAMA. 2004 Feb 4;291(5):576-84 Abstract quote.
CONTEXT: The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been associated with vascular occlusive events. However, the role of aPL in predicting ischemic events, particularly recurrent ischemic stroke, is controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of baseline aPL positivity (ie, positivity for anticardiolipin antibodies [aCL], lupus anticoagulant antibodies [LA], or both) on subsequent thrombo-occlusive events, including recurrent stroke.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study (APASS), a prospective cohort study within the Warfarin vs Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS), a randomized double-blind trial (N = 2206) conducted at multiple US clinical sites from June 1993 through June 2000 and comparing adjusted-dose warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 1.4-2.8) and aspirin (325 mg/d) for prevention of recurrent stroke or death. APASS participants were 1770 (80%) WARSS participants who consented to enroll in the APASS, with usable baseline blood samples drawn prior to randomization to the WARSS and analyzed for aPL status within 90 days of index stroke by a central independent laboratory. Quality assurance was performed on approximately 10% of samples by a second independent laboratory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Two-year rate of the composite end point of death from any cause, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other systemic thrombo-occlusive events. The primary analysis assessed the outcome associated with aPL positivity within each WARSS treatment group separately, after risk-factor adjustment (since these aPL-positive vs aPL-negative comparisons were not randomized). RESULTS: Of the 1770 APASS patients, 720 (41%) were classified as aPL-positive and 1050 (59%) as aPL-negative. There was no increased risk of thrombo-occlusive events associated with baseline aPL status in patients treated with either warfarin (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.31; P =.94), or aspirin (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.28; P =.71). The overall event rate was 22.2% among aPL-positive and 21.8% among aPL-negative patients. There was no treatment x aPL interaction (P =.91). Patients with baseline positivity for both LA and aCL antibodies tended to have a higher event rate (31.7%) than did patients who tested negative for both antibodies (24.0%) (unadjusted RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.97-1.92; P =.07). Classification and regression tree analyses did not identify a specific LA test or aCL isotype or titer that was associated with increased risk of thrombo-occlusive event.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of aPL (either LA or aCL) among patients with ischemic stroke does not predict either increased risk for subsequent vascular occlusive events over 2 years or a differential response to aspirin or warfarin therapy. Routine screening for aPL in patients with ischemic stroke does not appear warranted.
CLINICAL VARIANTS/GROSS DISEASE CHARACTERIZATION
Criteria for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in patients presenting with dermatologic symptoms.Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jul;57(1):112-5. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Abstract quote
The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the occurrence of arterial and/or venous thromboembolic events and obstetric complications in the setting of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies.
Dermatologic manifestations are commonly seen in APS with almost half of the patients exhibiting varied conditions such as ulceration, splinter hemorrhages, and livedo reticularis.
In this paper, we report the case of a 12-year-old boy who was diagnosed with APS after presenting with livedo reticularis and positive antiphospholipid antibodies. We discuss the difficulty of diagnosing APS in patients presenting solely with dermatologic complaints, as these skin manifestations are not specific enough for APS to be included in the Sapporo diagnostic criteria.
Proposed revisions to the Sapporo criteria to increase its specificity and sensitivity are also addressed.Pathogenic antibodies in women with obstetric features of antiphospholipid syndrome who have negative test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies.
Silver RM, Pierangeli SS, Edwin SS, Umar F, Harris EN, Scott JR, Branch DW.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 Mar;176(3):628-33 Abstract quote
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether women with clinical features of antiphospholipid syndrome but negative test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies have pathogenic antibodies not identified by currently used methods.
STUDY DESIGN: Sera were obtained from women with clinical features associated with antiphospholipid antibodies who had negative test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies (antiphospholipid syndrome-like). We studied (1) the effect of passive immunization with their purified immunoglobulin G fraction on murine pregnancy (n = 35) and (2) the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies other than lupus anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibodies (n = 39). Sera were also retested for anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant.
RESULTS: Fetal loss occurred in 235 of 1088 (22%) pups in 137 mice immunized with immunoglobulin G fraction from antiphospholipid syndrome-like women compared with 23 of 402 (6%) pups in 53 control mice. Immunoglobulin G from 11 study patients resulted in the loss of at least one third of the exposed pups. Five women had positive levels of antiphosphatidylserine antibodies (>99th percentile). All levels were low positive, and three women also had low-positive levels of anticardiolipin antibodies on repeat testing. Five of the 11 (45%) women whose immunoglobulin G fractions caused at least 33% fetal loss also had positive test results for antiphospholipid antibodies.
CONCLUSIONS: A subset of women with clinical disorders suspicious for antiphospholipid syndrome but who had negative test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies by current methods have serum immunoglobulin G that is pathogenic to murine pregnancy. Testing for pathogenic immunoglobulin G may provide additional means to identify women with an as yet uncharacterized immune condition. The clinical relevance of low levels of antiphospholipid antibodies in these women remains unproved.
Extensive cutaneous necrosis associated with anticardiolipin antibodies.
Paira S, Roverano S, Zunino A, Oliva ME, Bertolaccini ML.
Rheumatology Department, Hospital JM Cullen, Santa Fe, Republica Argentina.
J Rheumatol 1999 May;26(5):1197-200 Abstract quote
Extensive cutaneous necrosis (ECN) associated with antiphospholipid antibodies is a rare presentation.
We describe 2 patients with ECN and high titers of anticardiolipin antibodies. The mechanism by which these antibodies act has not been established and there is still controversy regarding treatment of these patients without established guidelines. In the few documented cases the use of pulse steroid therapy, anticoagulants, fibrinolytic agents, plasmapheresis, or a combination of them has shown some benefit.
Early recognition and treatment of the antiphospholipid syndrome may limit the extent of thrombotic complications that can result in tissue necrosis.
Widespread cutaneous necrosis occurring in association with the antiphospholipid syndrome: a report of two cases.
Creamer D, Hunt BJ, Black MM.
St John's Institute of Dermatology and Department of Haematology, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, U.K.
Br J Dermatol 2000 Jun;142(6):1199-203 Abstract quote
The antiphospholipid syndrome is an acquired prothrombotic state where thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss is related to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Cutaneous necrosis secondary to intravascular thrombosis of small dermal vessels is a recognized but rare association with antiphospholipid syndrome.
We report two patients with high circulating levels of anticardiolipin antibodies who developed widespread cutaneous necrosis as the first clinical manifestation of the antiphospholipid syndrome.
The exact mechanism by which antiphospholipid antibodies mediate thrombosis is uncertain; however, proposed mechanisms of activity include endothelial cell activation, altered endothelial production of prostacyclin, activation of platelets, and modulation of the protein C and S pathways.
Foetal loss, liver necrosis and acute lupus erythematosus in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
Fehr T, Cathomas G, Weber C, Fontana A, Schaffner A.
Medical Clinic B, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
Lupus 2001;10(8):576-9 Abstract quote
The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is characterized by arterial or venous thromboses and recurrent foetal loss. It occurs as primary disease, but also in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Whereas primary APS induces a thrombotic microangiopathy without significant inflammatory reaction, secondary APS in SLE is usually associated with vasculitis.
Here we report a patient with APS who presented with acute diarrhoea and then developed a HELLP-like syndrome characterized by a spontaneous abortion, multifocal hepatic necroses and thrombocytopenia. Thereafter an acute flare of SLE with arthralgias, pleuritis, skin rash and glomerulitis occurred. Clinical amelioration was only achieved by combining curettage, anticoagulation and immunosuppression, a treatment taking into account the pathogenesis of HELLP-like disease, APS and SLE.
To our knowledge this is the first reported case of APS associated with combined acute manifestations of these three syndromes triggered by a presumable intestinal infection.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:427
Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000;26:331
J Rheumatol 2000;27:Suppl 58:20
Macpherson and Pincus. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. Twentyfirst Edition. WB Saunders. 2006.
Rosai J. Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. Ninth Edition. Mosby 2004.
Sternberg S. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Fourth Edition. Lipincott Williams and Wilkins 2004.
Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Seventh Edition. WB Saunders 2005.
DeMay RM. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Volume 1 and 2. ASCP Press. 1996.
Weedon D. Weedon's Skin Pathology Second Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2002
Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill. 2003.
Weiss SW and Goldblum JR. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. Fourth Edition. Mosby 2001.
Basic Principles of Disease
Learn the basic disease classifications of cancers, infections, and inflammation
Commonly Used Terms
This is a glossary of terms often found in a pathology report.Diagnostic Process
Learn how a pathologist makes a diagnosis using a microscopeSurgical Pathology Report
Examine an actual biopsy report to understand what each section meansSpecial Stains
Understand the tools the pathologist utilizes to aid in the diagnosisHow Accurate is My Report?
Pathologists actively oversee every area of the laboratory to ensure your report is accurateGot Path?
Recent teaching cases and lectures presented in conferences
Pathologists Who Make A Difference
Search for a Physician Specialist
Last Updated September 7, 2007
Send
mail to The Doctor's Doctor with
questions or comments about this web site.
Read the Medical Disclaimer.
Copyright © The Doctor's Doctor